{"id":31,"date":"2006-02-28T22:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-02-28T22:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pgbsosyalizm.org\/yenicms\/?p=31"},"modified":"2014-02-05T23:25:56","modified_gmt":"2014-02-05T21:25:56","slug":"emek-partisinin-acmaz-tarihseldir-ama","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pgbsosyalizm.org\/?p=31","title":{"rendered":"Emek Partisi\u2019nin A\u00e7maz\u0131 Tarihseldir. Ama…"},"content":{"rendered":"

— \u015eadi OZANS\u00dc<\/p>\n

Emek Partisi (EMEP), T\u00fcrkiye sosyalist hareketi i\u00e7inde ger\u00e7ek bir partile\u015fme s\u00fcrecinin esas olarak i\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131 hareketi i\u00e7inden yarat\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin fark\u0131na varan ve buna uygun olarak davranmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan \u00f6rg\u00fctl\u00fc yap\u0131lar\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda geliyor. Bu partinin \u00f6nc\u00fcllerinin 70\u2019li y\u0131llar\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131ndaki \u00e7izgisi g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunduruldu\u011funda (THKO \u00e7izgisi) asl\u0131nda bu geli\u015fme olduk\u00e7a \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131. Muhtemelen bu olumlu y\u00f6nelim de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin ard\u0131nda Halk\u0131n Kurtulu\u015fu<\/em> \u00e7evresinin teorik ve \u00f6rg\u00fctsel donan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 ileride de\u011finece\u011fimiz t\u00fcm s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131na ra\u011fmen Arnavutluk Emek Partisi (AEP) \u00fczerinden kurgulam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n pay\u0131 \u00f6nemli gibi. Ger\u00e7ekten de Latin Amerika\u2019n\u0131n fococu \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme gelene\u011fini savunan bir ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 \u00e7izgisinin i\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fctlenmesine evrilmesi pek ola\u011fan bir geli\u015fme olmasa gerek. \u00d6te yandan SBKP\u2019nin (Sovyetler Birli\u011fi Kom\u00fcnist Partisi) T\u00fcrkiye uzant\u0131s\u0131 olan geleneksel TKP\u2019nin Sovyetler Birli\u011fi\u2019nin \u00e7\u00f6k\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle birlikte kendini tasfiye edip tarih sahnesinden silinmesi g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunduruldu\u011funda SBKP ve SSCB\u2019den hi\u00e7 de farkl\u0131 bir geli\u015fme seyri izlememi\u015f olan AEP\u2019nin ve Arnavutluk Halk Cumhuriyeti\u2019nin \u00e7\u00f6k\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne ra\u011fmen, zaman\u0131nda onun politikalar\u0131na s\u0131k\u0131 s\u0131k\u0131ya ba\u011fl\u0131 kalan bir yap\u0131n\u0131n mevcut geli\u015fimi anlaml\u0131 olsa gerek.<\/p>\n

Stalinizm\u2019in \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcl\u00fc\u015f\u00fc ve bunun Emek Partisi gelene\u011fine etkisi<\/strong><\/h1>\n

Stalinizm\u2019in \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcl\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnden s\u00f6z edildi\u011finde ister istemez ilk ba\u015fta SBKP\u2019nin \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcl\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc g\u00f6rmek gerekiyor. Ger\u00e7ekten d\u00fcnya Stalinist hareketi dendi\u011finde akla ilk gelen ne Latin Amerika kom\u00fcnist partileriydi, ne Arap kom\u00fcnist partileriydi ve ne de devasa \u00fcye say\u0131lar\u0131na ra\u011fmen ba\u015fta \u00c7in Halk Cumhuriyeti olmak \u00fczere Uzakdo\u011fu kom\u00fcnist partileriydi. Nitekim SBKP d\u00fcnyan\u0131n belli ba\u015fl\u0131 kom\u00fcnist partilerinin temel ideolojik besin kayna\u011f\u0131yd\u0131. S\u00f6zgelimi Bat\u0131 Avrupa\u2019n\u0131n Frans\u0131z, \u0130talyan, \u0130spanyol ve Portekiz kom\u00fcnist partileri i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikli referans kayna\u011f\u0131 hep SBKP oldu. Gene 1960\u2019l\u0131 y\u0131llardan sonra SBKP\u2019den belli bir kopu\u015fu ya\u015fam\u0131\u015f olan Romanya, Arnavutluk gibi \u00fclkelerin kom\u00fcnist partileri de en az\u0131ndan o tarihe kadar SBKP\u2019nin ideolojik, politik ve \u00f6rg\u00fctsel etki alan\u0131 i\u00e7inde yer al\u0131yorlard\u0131. \u00d6te yandan SBKP\u2019yi XX. Kongre ile birlikte Stalinizm\u2019den kopmu\u015f olarak g\u00f6rmek de son derece yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 bir g\u00f6zlem olsa gerek, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc herkesin bildi\u011fi gibi Kru\u015f\u00e7ev\u2019den sonra iktidara gelen Brejnev ve ekibi tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z Stalinist politikalar izlediler. Hatta Stalinizm\u2019e \u201csert\u201d ele\u015ftiriler y\u00f6neltmi\u015f olan Kru\u015f\u00e7ev d\u00f6neminin bile geleneksel Stalinizm\u2019den ciddi bir kopu\u015f anlam\u0131na gelmedi\u011fi bilinen bir ger\u00e7ektir.<\/p>\n

\u00d6te yandan Arnavutluk Devrimi\u2019nin tarihsel olarak asl\u0131nda Yugoslav Devrimi\u2019nin bir uzant\u0131s\u0131 olarak \u015fekillendi\u011fi g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulursa Arnavutluk Emek Partisi\u2019nin d\u00fcnya Stalinist hareketi \u00fczerinde ciddi bir etkisinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bellidir. Stalinizm\u2019le ilgili bu s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeyi yapmam\u0131n nedeni \u015fu: \u00d6zellikle SBKP\u2019nin \u00e7\u00f6k\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle birlikte d\u00fcnya Stalinist hareketinin i\u00e7ine girmi\u015f oldu\u011fu \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclme dikkat edilirse genel hatlar\u0131yla SBKP\u2019nin \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmesine benzer bir yol izledi. Yani bir ba\u015fka ifadeyle, d\u00fcnyan\u0131n belli ba\u015fl\u0131 kom\u00fcnist partilerinin i\u00e7ine girdikleri par\u00e7alanma s\u00fcrecinden ger\u00e7ek anlamda Marksist ak\u0131mlar \u00e7\u0131kmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, tam tersine a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kl\u0131 olarak kapitalizme neredeyse b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle teslim olmu\u015f yap\u0131lanmalara ge\u00e7ildi. Ger\u00e7ekten de dikkat edilirse \u0130talyan Kom\u00fcnist Partisi b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fuyla bir burjuva partisine evrildi. \u0130spanyol Kom\u00fcnist Partisi Avrupa\u2019n\u0131n neredeyse en liberal partisi haline geldi. Frans\u0131z Kom\u00fcnist Partisi\u2019nin neredeyse esamisi okunmaz oldu. Portekiz Kom\u00fcnist Partisi 1974 Devriminin ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 bir proleter devrime d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fmesini engellemi\u015f bir parti olarak, o s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 devrimin kazan\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131 bile savunmaktan aciz kald\u0131. Yunan Kom\u00fcnist Partisi ikiye b\u00f6l\u00fcn\u00fcp bir kesimi iyice liberalle\u015firken di\u011fer kesimi, yani KKE salt \u201cmilliyet\u00e7i\u201d bir s\u00f6ylemle ayakta kalmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yor. Di\u011fer taraftan \u00c7in Kom\u00fcnist Partisi (\u00c7KP) mafya kapitalizmine tam yol bayrak a\u00e7arken, ge\u00e7mi\u015fte en az\u0131ndan ulusal kurtulu\u015f sava\u015f\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki direni\u015fiyle ad\u0131n\u0131 duyuran Vietnam Kom\u00fcnist Partisi \u00c7KP\u2019yi taklit etmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yor. Geriye kala kala bir K\u00fcba Kom\u00fcnist Partisi kal\u0131yor ki, o da i\u00e7ine girmi\u015f oldu\u011fu emperyalist ablukadan s\u0131yr\u0131labilmek i\u00e7in 1967 y\u0131l\u0131ndan bu yana hep yapmas\u0131 gerekenin tam tersini yap\u0131yor: Latin Amerika\u2019da ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015f olan devrimci s\u00fcre\u00e7leri k\u0131\u015fk\u0131rtmak yerine ba\u015fta Lula y\u00f6netimini kullanarak Latin Amerika s\u0131n\u0131f m\u00fccadelelerini frenlemeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yor. K\u00fcba Kom\u00fcnist Partisi\u2019nin tarihsel misyonu neredeyse SBKP\u2019nin \u00e7\u00f6k\u00fc\u015f \u00f6ncesi misyonuyla \u00f6zde\u015fle\u015fmeye ba\u015flad\u0131. SBKP y\u00f6netimi, 30\u2019lu y\u0131llardan itibaren, kendi kurtulu\u015funun ba\u015fta Avrupa devrimlerini bo\u011fmaktansa geli\u015ftirmekten ge\u00e7ti\u011fini g\u00f6remedi\u011fi gibi, K\u00fcba Kom\u00fcnist Partisi de adan\u0131n nihai kurtulu\u015funun Latin Amerika devrimlerinden ge\u00e7ti\u011fini g\u00f6remiyor. M\u00fcmk\u00fcn olan her durumda emperyalizmle kendi b\u00fcrokratik \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n\u0131 koruma pahas\u0131na i\u015fbirli\u011fine gidiyor ve daha da k\u00f6t\u00fcs\u00fc mevcut \u201canti-Amerikan\u201d s\u00f6ylemine ra\u011fmen pratikte Venezuela, Bolivya gibi \u00fclkelerin s\u0131n\u0131f m\u00fccadelelerini dizginlemeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

\u0130\u015fte g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde d\u00fcnya Stalinist hareketinden geriye kalanlar\u0131n i\u00e7ine girdikleri bu politikalar T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de bir i\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131 hareketini in\u015fa etmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan Emek Partisi\u2019ni nas\u0131l etkiliyor? Sorunun kendisinden cevab\u0131n\u0131n olumsuz olaca\u011f\u0131 apa\u00e7\u0131k ortada. Ancak meseleyi sadece Stalinizm temelinde irdelemenin yetersiz kalaca\u011f\u0131 ger\u00e7e\u011finden hareketle 1<\/a><\/sup> i\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131 hareketinin yerel\/tarihsel konumlan\u0131\u015f\u0131na da dikkat etmek gerekiyor.<\/p>\n

\u015eimdi yerel bir hareketin uluslararas\u0131 ufkunu b\u00f6yle de\u011ferlendirdi\u011fimizde birbirinden son derece uzak iki yap\u0131n\u0131n \u2013 TKP ile EMEP\u2019in \u2013 nas\u0131l olup da \u015fimdilerde ayn\u0131 kom\u00fcnist partileri kendilerine yanda\u015f olarak g\u00f6rd\u00fcklerini \u2013 ki ge\u00e7mi\u015fte d\u00fc\u015fmand\u0131lar \u2013 a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n Stalinizm gelene\u011finden ba\u015fka bir nedeni olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kolayl\u0131kla g\u00f6r\u00fclebilece\u011fi gibi, ge\u00e7mi\u015f sosyal emperyalizm \u2013 sosyal fa\u015fizm ayr\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n da ne kadar y\u00fczeysel ve s\u0131n\u0131f d\u0131\u015f\u0131 yakla\u015f\u0131mlar oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r. Bununla birlikte, T\u00fcrkiye s\u0131n\u0131f m\u00fccadelesinin yerelli\u011finin her iki yap\u0131n\u0131n \u015fu an i\u00e7inde bulunduklar\u0131 ayr\u0131 y\u00f6neli\u015fleri a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yard\u0131mc\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131 kan\u0131s\u0131nday\u0131m. Nitekim \u015fimdiki TKP\u2019nin \u201ckitabi devrimci\u201d m\u00fccadele anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131ndansa EMEP\u2019in biraz daha pragmatik de olsa ayaklar\u0131 yere basan anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00fczerinde durmak gerekti\u011fi kan\u0131s\u0131nday\u0131m \u2013 her ne kadar pragmatizmin tehlikesine ileride de\u011finecek olsam da. Ger\u00e7ekten de EMEP gelene\u011fi 12 Eyl\u00fcl \u00f6ncesinde de \u015fimdiki TKP\u2019den farkl\u0131 olarak kom\u00fcnistlerin birli\u011findense s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n birli\u011finin \u00f6nemi \u00fczerinde daha fazla duruyordu. S\u00f6zgelimi, D\u0130SK \u2013 T\u00dcRK-\u0130\u015e ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yapayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Halk\u0131n Kurtulu\u015fu i\u00e7in hayati bir \u00f6neme sahipti ve a\u015f\u0131lmal\u0131yd\u0131. G\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde bu durum kendini pratikte 1 May\u0131s kutlamalar\u0131nda g\u00f6sterdi. EMEP 1 May\u0131s kutlamalar\u0131nda saf\u0131n\u0131 daha geni\u015f emek\u00e7i ve i\u015f\u00e7i y\u0131\u011f\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 T\u00dcRK-\u0130\u015e mitinginde tutarken TKP \u00f6nce \u201cdevrimcilerin\u201d ve daha sonra bunu da a\u015farak (!) sadece kendinin yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 zeminde tuttu. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bir taraf s\u0131n\u0131fa seslenmenin ve onunla ileti\u015fim kurmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n (EMEP) yolunu se\u00e7erken, di\u011feri kom\u00fcnistlere seslenmeyi (TKP) tercih ediyordu. Pragmatizm vurgusu ise ku\u015fkusuz EMEP\u2019in a\u00e7maz\u0131yd\u0131. Nitekim, Avrupa Birli\u011fi\u2019ne ve emperyalizme kar\u015f\u0131 m\u00fccadele etmenin yolunun berrak bir s\u0131n\u0131fsal m\u00fccadele hatt\u0131ndan ge\u00e7mesi gerekirken, DEHAP\u2019la yap\u0131lan se\u00e7im ittifak\u0131 b\u00fct\u00fcn bir s\u0131n\u0131fsal m\u00fccadele zeminini bulan\u0131kla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131yordu. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ifade etmek gerekirse, T\u00fcrkiye i\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 en \u00f6nemli sald\u0131r\u0131 \u00f6zelle\u015ftirme, ta\u015feronla\u015ft\u0131rma, kurals\u0131z \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma, sendikalar\u0131n yok edilmesi, sosyal g\u00fcvenlik sistemin berhava edilmesi, sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n ve e\u011fitimin \u00f6zelle\u015ftirilmesi, b\u00f6lgesel asgari \u00fccret uygulamas\u0131na ge\u00e7ilmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 iken b\u00fct\u00fcn bu konularla ilgilenmeyen ya da en az\u0131ndan bunlara ve tabii Irak\u2019\u0131n emperyalistlerce i\u015fgaline kay\u0131ts\u0131z kalan bir hareketle se\u00e7im ittifak\u0131na gidilmesi EMEP\u2019in seslenmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 geni\u015f emek\u00e7i y\u0131\u011f\u0131nlar \u00fczerinde ne t\u00fcr bir etki b\u0131rak\u0131yordu? Bu politikalarla y\u00fcr\u00fcmek birle\u015fik bir emek cephesinin yarat\u0131lmas\u0131ndansa burjuva politikalar\u0131n pe\u015fine tak\u0131lacak mu\u011flak bir halk cephesi anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131na y\u00f6nelmekten ba\u015fka bir anlam ifade ediyor mu? Ku\u015fkusuz yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken ezilen K\u00fcrt halk\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131nda yer almak, bask\u0131c\u0131 devlet ayg\u0131t\u0131n\u0131n sald\u0131r\u0131lar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda onunla dayan\u0131\u015fmakt\u0131, ama \u00f6zelle\u015ftirmeye kar\u015f\u0131 ses \u00e7\u0131karmayan AB\u2019ci bir \u00f6nderlikle birlikte hareket etmek i\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n\u0131n varolan s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 bilincini bile geriletiyordu.
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

EMEP\u2019te i\u00e7 demokrasi<\/strong><\/h1>\n

EMEP\u2019in yukar\u0131da and\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z Stalinist anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131, onu ister istemez s\u0131n\u0131fa kar\u015f\u0131 da buyurgan bir konuma getiriyor. Kom\u00fcnist Manifesto\u2019nun \u201ckom\u00fcnistlerin i\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131ndan ayr\u0131 bir \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131 yoktur!\u201d yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 ne yaz\u0131k ki EMEP i\u00e7in bir hareket noktas\u0131 te\u015fkil etmiyor. EMEP\u2019in \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131 her \u015feyin \u00fcst\u00fcnde. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc o da, aynen TKP gibi Stalinist bir gelenekten geldi\u011fi ve bu gelene\u011fi \u0131srarla savunageldi\u011fi i\u00e7in s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131yla kendi \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcnkini \u00f6zde\u015fle\u015ftirme yan\u0131lg\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fcyor. S\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n kurtulu\u015f ve iktidar m\u00fccadelesinde bir ara\u00e7 olan, daha ba\u015fka bir ifadeyle bu m\u00fccadelede s\u0131n\u0131fa kendi iktidar organlar\u0131n\u0131 yaratmada en \u00f6nemli yard\u0131mc\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 olmas\u0131 gereken partiyi \u2013 ki bu bir i\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131 partisi bile olsa b\u00f6yledir \u2013 dokunulmaz bir ayg\u0131t, daha do\u011frusu amac\u0131n kendisi olarak g\u00f6r\u00fcyor. Ekim Devrimi\u2019nin arifesinde s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n\u0131 kendi \u00f6z partisinin \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcnde g\u00f6ren Lenin\u2019in anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131na yak\u0131nla\u015fam\u0131yor. Nitekim Rusya\u2019da ba\u015fta Viborg i\u015f\u00e7ileri olmak \u00fczere s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n en ileri kesimlerinin iktidar talebine s\u0131rt \u00e7eviren Bol\u015fevik Partisi\u2019ne \u2013 yani kendi partisine \u2013 s\u0131rt\u0131n\u0131 d\u00f6nme tehdidini savurarak, bizzat partiyi bile g\u00f6zden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131p iktidar talep eden i\u015f\u00e7ilere y\u00f6nelmeyi kafas\u0131na koyan Lenin\u2019i anlayam\u0131yor. Toplumun b\u00fct\u00fcn s\u0131n\u0131flar\u0131ndan daha homojen olan, ama gene de kendi i\u00e7inde burjuva hegemonyas\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131llard\u0131r s\u00fcren etkisi nedeniyle \u00e7e\u015fitli d\u00fczeylerde farkl\u0131l\u0131klar g\u00f6steren bir s\u0131n\u0131f olma niteli\u011fini korumaya devam eden i\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n\u0131n bu yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 kavrayam\u0131yor. Stalinizm\u2019in \u00f6rg\u00fct feti\u015fizminin s\u0131n\u0131f m\u00fccadelesinin yolunu a\u00e7may\u0131 engelledi\u011fini g\u00f6remiyor. Parti ayg\u0131t\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n\u0131n baz\u0131 durumlarda s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n genel \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131yla 2<\/a><\/sup> \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011fini fark edemiyor. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla da, b\u00fct\u00fcn iyi niyetli \u00e7abalar\u0131na ra\u011fmen s\u0131n\u0131fa genel bir g\u00fcven duygusu a\u015f\u0131layam\u0131yor. Oysaki, s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n birli\u011finin ve birle\u015fik m\u00fccadelesinin yarat\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in EMEP\u2019i a\u015fan kanallar\u0131n yarat\u0131lmas\u0131na ihtiya\u00e7 var. Bunlar, i\u015f\u00e7ilerin \u00f6zg\u00fcvenlerini peki\u015ftirecekleri yap\u0131lanmalar\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131 dayat\u0131yor. Bir di\u011fer ifadeyle parti, asl\u0131nda s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n birle\u015fik m\u00fccadelesini planlamaya, d\u00fczenlemeye, organize etmeye yarayacak bir ayg\u0131t. B\u00f6yle g\u00f6r\u00fclmeli. Kom\u00fcnistlerin g\u00f6revi bu yolda i\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131na yard\u0131mc\u0131 olmaktan ge\u00e7er. Emir komuta anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131yla hareket etmesinden de\u011fil. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ger\u00e7ek bir s\u0131n\u0131f partisinin in\u015fas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde ya\u015fanacak toplant\u0131larda (kongrelerde) kimsenin s\u00f6yleyece\u011fini s\u00f6ylemekten \u00e7ekinmemesi, partinin y\u00f6netici organlar\u0131yla kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya gelmekten korkmamas\u0131 gerekir. S\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n kendisi homojen olmay\u0131p farkl\u0131 kesimlerden olu\u015ftu\u011fu i\u00e7in farkl\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin ortaya \u00f6zg\u00fcrce at\u0131labilip tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. Bunun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerde parti i\u00e7i demokrasi yoktur. Parti i\u00e7i demokrasinin i\u015flemedi\u011fi yerde de s\u0131n\u0131f m\u00fccadelesi g\u00fc\u00e7lenemez. Bu anlamda Lenin d\u00f6nemi Bol\u015fevik Partisi\u2019nden daha demokratik bir yap\u0131lanman\u0131n ya\u015fanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kan\u0131s\u0131nday\u0131m. Stalinist anlay\u0131\u015flar\u0131n terk edilip bol\u015fevizmin bu miras\u0131na yeniden sahip \u00e7\u0131kmak EMEP\u2019in tek sesli yap\u0131s\u0131ndan kurtulup atmas\u0131 gereken ilk ad\u0131md\u0131r.<\/p>\n

G\u00f6zlemleyebildi\u011fim kadar\u0131yla EMEP\u2019in kurulu\u015f felsefesi bug\u00fcnk\u00fc konumlan\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n olduk\u00e7a ilerisindeydi. Yukar\u0131da \u00e7izmi\u015f oldu\u011fum ger\u00e7ek bir s\u0131n\u0131f partisine y\u00f6nelmede at\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 ad\u0131mlar\u0131 son derece yetersiz bile olsa daha tutarl\u0131yd\u0131. Zaman i\u00e7inde bunlar\u0131n hepsi teker teker yitirildi. Nakliyat-\u0130\u015f \u2013 T\u00dcMT\u0130S \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 EMEP\u2019in gerileme d\u00f6nemine giri\u015finin d\u00f6n\u00fcm noktas\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130\u015f bu noktaya vard\u0131ktan sonra art\u0131k yap\u0131labilecek \u00e7ok az \u015fey kald\u0131. S\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n birli\u011finin sa\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131n en basit ad\u0131mlar\u0131ndan biri \u2013 EMEP y\u00f6netiminin de gayet iyi bilmesi gerekti\u011fi gibi \u2013 ilk elde s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n kitle \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin birli\u011finin sa\u011flanmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131ndan ge\u00e7er. Ama EMEP y\u00f6netiminin b\u00fcrokratik Stalinist \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n bir sonucu olarak bu en basit s\u0131n\u0131f m\u00fccadelesi ilkesi bile \u00e7i\u011fnenmi\u015ftir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc sorun i\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n\u0131n asl\u0131nda \u00e7ok da \u00f6nem arz etmeyen bir sekt\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcn sendikal y\u00f6netiminin her ne pahas\u0131na olursa olsun partiye ba\u011fl\u0131 k\u0131l\u0131nmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 de\u011fildir. \u0130\u015fte bu tam da 1920\u2019li y\u0131llar\u0131n ba\u015flar\u0131nda, yani \u201cSava\u015f Kom\u00fcnizmi\u201d y\u0131llar\u0131nda Tro\u00e7ki\u2019nin son derece yanl\u0131\u015f bir bi\u00e7imde sendikalar\u0131 partiye ba\u011flama anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n bir benzeridir. \u00dcstelik bundan da daha k\u00f6t\u00fcd\u00fcr, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc o d\u00f6nemde ortada bir i\u015f\u00e7i devleti vard\u0131r. Lenin, i\u015f\u00e7i devletine ra\u011fmen sendikalar\u0131n ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z ederek bu anlay\u0131\u015fa kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar. EMEP y\u00f6netiminin, partinin \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n\u0131 her \u015feyin \u00fcst\u00fcnde g\u00f6rmesi anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131 Nakliyat-\u0130\u015f \u2013 T\u00dcMT\u0130S aras\u0131ndaki ak\u0131l almaz \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmay\u0131 k\u00f6r\u00fcklemi\u015ftir. Konumuz ba\u015fka siyasi yap\u0131lar\u0131n de\u011ferlendirmesi olmay\u0131p sadece EMEP\u2019i kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Halk\u0131n Kurtulu\u015f Partisi\u2019ni ele\u015ftirmek bu yaz\u0131n\u0131n alan\u0131na girmiyor. Muhtemelen ayn\u0131 Stalinist gelenek s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011fundan partilerin yerini de\u011fi\u015ftirsek belki de ayn\u0131 sonu\u00e7lara var\u0131lacakt\u0131, belki de var\u0131lmayacakt\u0131. Bu \u00e7ok \u00f6nemli de\u011fil. \u00d6nemli olan EMEP y\u00f6netiminin parti d\u0131\u015f\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7i \u00f6rg\u00fctlenmelerine yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n irdelenmesidir. EMEP\u2019in bu konudaki anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131 Leninist de\u011fildir. Ve ku\u015fkusuz olumsuz sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 da fazlas\u0131yla vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fta sendikalar olmak \u00fczere, parti d\u0131\u015f\u0131 kitlesel i\u015f\u00e7i \u00f6rg\u00fctlerine Leninist yakla\u015f\u0131m kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 sayg\u0131 ve g\u00fcven temeli \u00fczerinde ve i\u00e7i\u015flerine b\u00fcrokratik m\u00fcdahalelerde bulunmadan s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmelidir. \u015eu soruya verilecek cevap her \u015feyden \u00f6nemlidir: Nakliyat-\u0130\u015f veya T\u00dcMT\u0130S olsun, bu iki sendikal yap\u0131n\u0131n bar\u0131nd\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7iler se\u00e7imlerde a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kl\u0131 olarak hangi siyasal partilere oy vermi\u015flerdir, EMEP\u2019e mi? B\u00f6yle olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sendika i\u00e7i se\u00e7imlerin bile kaybedilmesinden belli de\u011fil mi?<\/p>\n

\u00d6te yandan EMEP\u2019in KESK i\u00e7inde y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc politika da tutarl\u0131 de\u011fildir. Y\u0131llard\u0131r bu sendikan\u0131n (?) y\u00f6netiminde kalabilmek i\u00e7in izlenmesi gereken politikalara tam z\u0131t b\u00fcrokratik manevralar s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmektedir. Diyelim ki \u201cYurtseverler\u201dle anla\u015f\u0131yorsunuz. Peki \u00d6DP ile de mi ayn\u0131 zeminde duruyorsunuz? \u0130\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n\u0131n birli\u011fini sa\u011flama yolunda y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcz politikalar \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde gerek Nakliyat-\u0130\u015f \u2013 T\u00dcMT\u0130S meselesinde gerekse KESK\u2019te izledi\u011finiz politikalarla genel olarak i\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131na nas\u0131l bir mesaj iletti\u011finizin fark\u0131nda m\u0131s\u0131n\u0131z? Yoksa parti program\u0131n\u0131z farkl\u0131, g\u00fcnl\u00fck politikalar\u0131n\u0131z farkl\u0131 m\u0131? Program sizin i\u00e7in kitlelere uzanman\u0131n bir arac\u0131 m\u0131 yoksa \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na verilecek bir yaz\u0131 par\u00e7as\u0131ndan m\u0131 ibaret?<\/p>\n

Gelelim program meselesine<\/strong><\/h1>\n

Bug\u00fcn d\u00fcnyada kendini \u201csol\u201d olarak tan\u0131mlayan b\u00fct\u00fcn yap\u0131lar\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcnde bir turnusol ka\u011f\u0131d\u0131 var: \u00fcretim ara\u00e7lar\u0131 \u00fczerindeki \u00f6zel m\u00fclkiyet rejimine ili\u015fkin tav\u0131r! Ger\u00e7ekten de, genel olarak \u00fcretim ara\u00e7lar\u0131 \u00fczerindeki \u00f6zel m\u00fclkiyet rejimine, ama ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 olarak da bir \u00e7ok \u00fclkede b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00fcretim ara\u00e7lar\u0131 \u00fczerindeki \u00f6zel m\u00fclkiyet rejimine kar\u015f\u0131 devrimci bir y\u00fckseli\u015f durumunda net olarak ne tav\u0131r al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar bir siyasi yap\u0131n\u0131n ya da partinin s\u0131n\u0131f karakterini belirlemede temel ayra\u00e7 oluyor. Program\u0131nda, bir devrimci durumda \u00f6zellikle b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00fcretim ara\u00e7lar\u0131 \u00fczerindeki \u00f6zel m\u00fclkiyet rejimine son vermeyi ba\u011f\u0131ra ba\u011f\u0131ra ilan etmeyen partilerin devrimci y\u00fckseli\u015fi nas\u0131l bo\u015fa \u00e7\u0131karacaklar\u0131 (e\u011fer kitle hareketi onlar\u0131 da a\u015fan bir bi\u00e7imde bu sorunu g\u00fcndeme getirmezse) tarihin bug\u00fcne kadar kan\u0131tlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi bellidir. Ama g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde, ge\u00e7mi\u015fte oldu\u011fundan da fazla bir \u00f6nem arz ediyor bu cevap. Ger\u00e7ekten de \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fcyen kapitalizm d\u00f6neminin \u00f6zellikle 1975 sonras\u0131 y\u0131llar\u0131ndan itibaren \u2013 ki SSCB\u2019nin ve Do\u011fu Avrupa rejimlerinin \u00e7\u00f6k\u00fc\u015f\u00fc de bu d\u00f6nemin i\u00e7indedir \u2013 g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcze kadar ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 bir proleter devrimine tan\u0131k olunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortada. Bilindi\u011fi gibi 60 milyon insan\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ve muazzam bir \u00fcretici g\u00fc\u00e7ler y\u0131k\u0131m\u0131 ile sonu\u00e7lanan II. D\u00fcnya Sava\u015f\u0131\u2019ndan sonraki 30 y\u0131lda kapitalist d\u00fcnya ekonomisi bir \u201cboom\u201d d\u00f6nemi ya\u015fad\u0131. Bu d\u00f6nemin 1974-75 y\u0131llar\u0131nda sona ermesiyle birlikte d\u00fcnya kapitalist ekonomisi y\u00fczy\u0131l\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda i\u00e7ine girdi\u011fi \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fcmeyi daha h\u0131zlanarak ya\u015famaya ba\u015flad\u0131. Ba\u015f\u0131n\u0131 ABD emperyalizminin \u00e7okuluslu \u015firketlerinin \u00e7ekti\u011fi d\u00fcnya ekonomisi \u00e7oktan olu\u015fmu\u015f olan d\u00fcnya pazar\u0131ndaki i\u00e7 tekelci rekabet y\u00fcz\u00fcnden d\u00fcnya \u00fcretici g\u00fc\u00e7lerini y\u0131kma eylemini h\u0131zland\u0131rarak s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fcyor. Bu ise, do\u011fal olarak kurals\u0131z \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmay\u0131, esnekli\u011fi, i\u015f\u00e7i \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131, uluslar\u0131n par\u00e7alanmas\u0131n\u0131, d\u00fcnyan\u0131n ve tabii bu arada metropol \u00fclkeler dahil b\u00fct\u00fcn geri b\u0131rakt\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f kapitalist \u00fclkelerin b\u00f6lgelere ayr\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131, sermayenin i\u015fg\u00fcc\u00fc maliyetlerinin en ucuz oldu\u011fu \u00fclkelere kayd\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131, i\u015f\u00e7i \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin birer s\u0131n\u0131f \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc olmaktan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131l\u0131p korporatist yap\u0131lara b\u00fcr\u00fcnd\u00fcr\u00fclerek STK\u2019la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcndeme getiriyor. IMF\u2019nin, D\u00fcnya Bankas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n, D\u00fcnya Ticaret \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn direktiflerine g\u00f6re hareket eden b\u00f6lgesel emperyalist yap\u0131lar\u0131n (AB, FTAA, MERCOSUR, SAARC gibi) do\u011fmas\u0131na neden oluyor.<\/p>\n

\u0130\u015fte b\u00fct\u00fcn bu ko\u015fullar alt\u0131nda, ge\u00e7mi\u015fte \u00c7in\u2019de, K\u00fcba\u2019da ve Vietnam\u2019da oldu\u011fu gibi, y\u00f6netici partilerin program\u0131nda yer almasa bile ayaklanan kitlelerin itici g\u00fcc\u00fcyle \u00fcretim ara\u00e7lar\u0131 \u00fczerindeki \u00f6zel m\u00fclkiyet rejimlerinin tasfiyesi ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015fken, g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde bu durum daha zorla\u015fm\u0131\u015f g\u00f6z\u00fck\u00fcyor. Yani bir ba\u015fka ifadeyle Mao\u2019nun ya da Castro\u2019nun ya da Ho \u015ei Minh\u2019in \u00f6ng\u00f6rmedikleri bir bi\u00e7imde demokratik devrimin kesintisiz olarak sosyalist devrime evrilmesi s\u00fcreci g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde daha da zorla\u015fm\u0131\u015f durumda ve ister istemez devrimlere \u00f6nc\u00fcl\u00fck edecek olan yap\u0131lar\u0131n iradi m\u00fcdahalesini aynen 1917 Ekim Devrimi\u2019nde oldu\u011fu gibi zorunlu k\u0131l\u0131yor. Bug\u00fcn Latin Amerika devrimlerinde ya\u015fanan s\u00fcre\u00e7 tam da bu. O y\u00fczden de EMEP\u2019in program\u0131nda mu\u011flak olarak yer alan ve \u00d6DP\u2019ninkinde ise hi\u00e7 yer almayan b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00fcretim ara\u00e7lar\u0131 \u00fczerindeki \u00f6zel m\u00fclkiyet rejiminin tasfiyesi meselesi can al\u0131c\u0131 bir nitelik kazan\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

B\u00fct\u00fcn i\u015f\u00e7i \u00f6rg\u00fctlerine \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131<\/strong><\/h1>\n

\u0130KP (\u0130\u015f\u00e7i Karde\u015fli\u011fi Partisi) giri\u015fimi T\u00fcrkiye i\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn kesimlerini bir araya getirip kitlesel bir i\u015f\u00e7i partisi in\u015fa etmenin yolunu a\u00e7maya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yor. Bu parti bir anlamda bir birle\u015fik i\u015f\u00e7i cephesinin n\u00fcvesini te\u015fkil edecektir. Bu parti, patronlardan ve devletten ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00fct\u00fcn i\u015f\u00e7i \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin bir araya gelebilece\u011fi bir yap\u0131lanmay\u0131 hedefliyor. Bu temel ilkeleri kendine rehber edinmi\u015f b\u00fct\u00fcn i\u015f\u00e7i \u00f6rg\u00fctleri ve yanda\u015flar\u0131 b\u00f6yle bir partinin i\u00e7inde \u00f6zg\u00fcrce yer alabilme hakk\u0131na sahip olacaklar. Bu parti, kendini \u201csa\u011fc\u0131l\u0131k ve solculuk\u201d zemininde kurgulam\u0131yor, s\u0131n\u0131f\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k zemininde kurguluyor. T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin en k\u0131sa zamanda kitlesel bir i\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131 partisine ihtiyac\u0131 var. Burjuvazinin ve emperyalizmin azg\u0131n sald\u0131r\u0131lar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 direnip kar\u015f\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131ya ge\u00e7ebilmenin yolu her \u015feyden \u00f6nce b\u00f6yle bir partinin in\u015fas\u0131ndan ge\u00e7iyor. At\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken ad\u0131m bu. B\u00fct\u00fcn i\u015f\u00e7i \u00f6rg\u00fctlerini ve bu arada EMEP\u2019i de b\u00f6yle bir partinin i\u00e7inde yer almaya \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rman\u0131n anlaml\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcmden bu yaz\u0131y\u0131 kaleme almay\u0131 g\u00f6rev sayd\u0131m.<\/p>\n

\u00dcretim ara\u00e7lar\u0131 \u00fczerindeki \u00f6zel m\u00fclkiyet rejimine son verecek bir i\u015f\u00e7i k\u00f6yl\u00fc h\u00fck\u00fcmetinin yolunun a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in \u0130KP\u2019nin in\u015fas\u0131 bir zorunluluk. T\u00fcrkiye i\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n\u0131n buna ihtiyac\u0131 var!<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

  1. Bunu b\u00f6yle ifade etmemin nedeni, T\u00fcrkiye sosyalist politikas\u0131nda EMEP ile TKP\u2019nin asl\u0131nda ayn\u0131 Stalinist gelene\u011fin miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 olmalar\u0131na ra\u011fmen aralar\u0131ndaki anlay\u0131\u015f farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle ister istemez, yaz\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan da anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, EMEP\u2019i daha ayr\u0131cal\u0131kl\u0131 bir konuma yerle\u015ftirmi\u015f olmamda yat\u0131yor.[↩<\/a>]<\/span><\/li>
  2. Tabii bu \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n devrimci bir karakter ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 anlardan s\u00f6z ediyorum, yoksa bir\u00e7ok durumda bu \u00e7\u0131karlar parti ayg\u0131t\u0131n\u0131n gerisinde olabilir.[↩<\/a>]<\/span><\/li><\/ol>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    — \u015eadi OZANS\u00dc<\/p>\n

    Emek Partisi (EMEP), T\u00fcrkiye sosyalist hareketi i\u00e7inde ger\u00e7ek bir partile\u015fme s\u00fcrecinin esas olarak i\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131 hareketi i\u00e7inden yarat\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin fark\u0131na varan ve buna uygun olarak davranmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan \u00f6rg\u00fctl\u00fc yap\u0131lar\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda geliyor. Bu partinin \u00f6nc\u00fcllerinin 70\u2019li y\u0131llar\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131ndaki \u00e7izgisi g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunduruldu\u011funda (THKO \u00e7izgisi) asl\u0131nda bu geli\u015fme olduk\u00e7a \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131. Muhtemelen bu olumlu y\u00f6nelim de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin ard\u0131nda Halk\u0131n Kurtulu\u015fu<\/em> \u00e7evresinin teorik ve \u00f6rg\u00fctsel donan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 ileride de\u011finece\u011fimiz t\u00fcm s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131na ra\u011fmen Arnavutluk Emek Partisi (AEP) \u00fczerinden kurgulam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n pay\u0131 \u00f6nemli gibi. Ger\u00e7ekten de Latin Amerika\u2019n\u0131n fococu \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme gelene\u011fini savunan bir ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 \u00e7izgisinin i\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fctlenmesine evrilmesi pek ola\u011fan bir geli\u015fme olmasa gerek. \u00d6te yandan SBKP\u2019nin (Sovyetler Birli\u011fi Kom\u00fcnist Partisi) T\u00fcrkiye uzant\u0131s\u0131 olan geleneksel TKP\u2019nin Sovyetler Birli\u011fi\u2019nin \u00e7\u00f6k\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle birlikte kendini tasfiye edip tarih sahnesinden silinmesi g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunduruldu\u011funda SBKP ve SSCB\u2019den hi\u00e7 de farkl\u0131 bir geli\u015fme seyri izlememi\u015f olan AEP\u2019nin ve Arnavutluk Halk Cumhuriyeti\u2019nin \u00e7\u00f6k\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne ra\u011fmen, zaman\u0131nda onun politikalar\u0131na s\u0131k\u0131 s\u0131k\u0131ya ba\u011fl\u0131 kalan bir yap\u0131n\u0131n mevcut geli\u015fimi anlaml\u0131 olsa gerek.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-34-say-mart-2006"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pgbsosyalizm.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pgbsosyalizm.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pgbsosyalizm.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pgbsosyalizm.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pgbsosyalizm.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=31"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/pgbsosyalizm.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":401,"href":"https:\/\/pgbsosyalizm.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31\/revisions\/401"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pgbsosyalizm.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=31"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pgbsosyalizm.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=31"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pgbsosyalizm.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=31"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}